您的位置: 专家智库 > >

国家自然科学基金(40471099)

作品数:3 被引量:76H指数:3
相关作者:张仁华周艳莲朱治林孙晓敏田静更多>>
相关机构:中国科学院中国科学院研究生院中国科学院大学更多>>
发文基金:国家自然科学基金国家重点基础研究发展计划中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目更多>>
相关领域:天文地球更多>>

文献类型

  • 3篇中文期刊文章

领域

  • 3篇天文地球

主题

  • 2篇地表
  • 2篇地表粗糙度
  • 1篇通量
  • 1篇千烟洲
  • 1篇下垫面
  • 1篇空间异质性
  • 1篇SURFAC...
  • 1篇CHINAF...
  • 1篇DYNAMI...
  • 1篇FLUXES
  • 1篇不同下垫面
  • 1篇大气稳定度
  • 1篇稳定度
  • 1篇YUCHEN...
  • 1篇ROUGHN...

机构

  • 2篇中国科学院
  • 1篇中国科学院研...
  • 1篇中国科学院大...

作者

  • 2篇田静
  • 2篇孙晓敏
  • 2篇朱治林
  • 2篇周艳莲
  • 2篇张仁华
  • 1篇温学发
  • 1篇关德新
  • 1篇刘允芬
  • 1篇袁国富

传媒

  • 1篇地理研究
  • 1篇中国科学(D...
  • 1篇Scienc...

年份

  • 1篇2007
  • 2篇2006
3 条 记 录,以下是 1-3
排序方式:
几种典型地表粗糙度计算方法的比较研究被引量:41
2007年
本文分别利用最小二乘拟合迭代法、牛顿迭代法、TVM法和Martano法计算2003年长白山森林地表粗糙度。结果表明,Martano法计算结果偏小,其他三种方法结果基本一致。不确定性分析表明,Martano法的不确定性与参与计算的数据量有关。拟合迭代法和牛顿迭代法的不确定性在于,通常假设u*不随观测高度而变化,而实际u*随观测高度变化。若相邻两个观测高度之间的u*变化1%,地表粗糙度计算误差8.3%。TVM法由于参数C1的选取范围为0.9~1.05,引起地表粗糙度不确定性平均值为29.9%。经计算得到长白山森林在各种大气层结条件下的地表粗糙度,拟合迭代法得到的2003年稳定、中性和不稳定条件下的地表粗糙度年平均值分别为2.642、2.103和1.616m。
周艳莲孙晓敏朱治林温学发田静张仁华
关键词:地表粗糙度大气稳定度
Surface roughness length dynamic over several different surfaces and its effects on modeling fluxes被引量:14
2006年
Roughness length and zero-plane displacement over three typical surfaces were calculated iteratively by least-square method, which are Yucheng Experimental Station for agriculture surfaces, Qianyanzhou Experimental Station for complex and undulant surfaces, and Changbai Mountains Experimental Station for forest surfaces. On the basis of roughness length dynamic, the effects of roughness length dynamic on fluxes were analyzed with SEBS model. The results indicate that, aerodynamic roughness length changes with vegetation conditions (such as vegetation height, LAI), wind speed, friction velocity and some other factors. In Yucheng and Changbai Mountains Experimental Station, aerodynamic roughness length over the fetch of flux tower changes with vegetation height and LAI obviously, that is, with the increase of LAI, roughness length increases to the peak value firstly, and then decreases. In Qianyanzhou Experimental Station, LAI changes slightly, so the relationship between roughness length and LAI is not obvious. The aerodynamic roughness length of Yucheng and Changbai Mountains Experimental Station changes slightly with wind direction, while aerodynamic roughness length of Qianyanzhou Experimental Station changes obviously with wind direction. The reason for that is the terrain in Yucheng and Changbai Mountains Experimental Station is relatively flat, while in Qianyanzhou Experimental Station the terrain is very undulant and heterogeneous. With the increase of wind speed, aerodynamic roughness length of Yucheng Experimental Station changes slightly, while it decreases obviously in Qianyanzhou Experimental Station and Changbai Mountains Experimental Station. Roughness length dynamic takes great effects on fluxes calculation, and the effects are analyzed by SEBS model. By comparing 1 day averaged roughness length in Yucheng Experimental Station and 5 day averaged roughness length of Qianyanzhou and Changbai Mountains Experimental Station with roughness length parameter chosen by the model, the effects of roughness le
ZHOU Yanlian, SUN Xiaomin, ZHU Zhilin, ZHANG Renhua, TIAN Jing, LIU Yunfen, GUAN Dexin & YUAN Guofu Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
关键词:CHINAFLUXSURFACEROUGHNESSDYNAMICYUCHENG
几种不同下垫面地表粗糙度动态变化及其对通量机理模型模拟的影响被引量:30
2006年
在众多地表通量模拟模型和遥感通量反演模型中,空气动力学粗糙度(z0)是一个重要的地表参数.选取代表典型农田的禹城站,代表复杂下垫面的千烟洲站和代表森林下垫面的长白山站3个通量观测站的风速和温度廓线资料,运用最小二乘法拟合迭代,分别计算得到各站点通量塔所在地的零平面位移和空气动力学粗糙度.在此基础上,分别分析不同下垫面的空气动力学粗糙度随作物高度和叶面积指数(LAI)、风向(地形)、风速、摩擦速度等因子的变化.并采用SEBS模型分析地表空气动力学粗糙度动态变化对地表通量计算的影响.结果表明:空气动力学粗糙度随植被特征(如作物高度,叶面积指数等)以及风向、风速和摩擦速度等因子而变化.禹城和长白山站通量塔所在风浪区的空气动力学粗糙度明显随作物生长期植被高度及叶面积指数变化,即先随LAI增加而增加,达到峰值后,随LAI增加而减小;千烟洲叶面积指数变化较小,空气动力学粗糙度随叶面积指数的变化不明显;地形较平坦的禹城和长白山站空气动力学粗糙度随风向变化较小,而地形起伏较大的千烟洲站空气动力学粗糙度随风向变化较大.随着风速的变化,禹城站空气动力学粗糙度没有明显变化,而千烟洲和长白山空气动力学粗糙度表现出随风速增加而减小的趋势.各站空气动力学粗糙度的这种动态变化对模型通量反演有较大影响,通过模型分析, 5月1日~6月3日禹城空气动力学粗糙度日平均值、千烟洲及长白山通量塔空气动力学粗糙度5d平均值与模型所取z0值相比,由于z0的动态变化造成相同时间尺度显热通量H的计算相对误差的绝对值最大可分别达到2.726%,33.802%和18.105%.
周艳莲孙晓敏朱治林张仁华田静刘允芬关德新袁国富
关键词:地表粗糙度空间异质性千烟洲
共1页<1>
聚类工具0